Advance Refundings of Municipal Bonds
نویسندگان
چکیده
Municipal bonds are often “advance refunded.” Bonds that are not yet callable are defeased by creating a trust that pays the interest up to the call date, and pays the call price. New debt, generally at lower interest rates, is issued to fund the trust. Advance refunding has zero net present value in the case of no uncertainty and no fees, otherwise the transaction destroys value. We estimate that for the typical bond in an advance refunding, a municipality loses approximately 1% of the par value not including fees, which translates to an aggregate value lost of over $4 billion from 1996 to 2009 for the bonds in our sample, which are roughly half of the universe of advance refunded bonds that traded during the period. The worst 5% of bonds lose represent a destruction of $2.9 billion for taxpayers. Municipalities may engage in advance refunding because it enables them to borrow to fund current operating activities in exchange for higher interest payments after the call date. We find that municipalities in the most corrupt states destroy the most value by advance refunding.
منابع مشابه
Pii: S1057-0810(99)00033-5
The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the municipal bond market with an emphasis on the numerous embedded contingent claims. Embedded contingent claims include the standard call features, sinking funds, the advance refunding option, the synthetic advance refunding option, the credit risk option (default risk), marketability, and the numerous tax-related events. Municipal bond i...
متن کاملRefunding Efficiency: A Generalized Approach
Refunding efficiency, a measure of the optimality of a refunding decision, is widely used in the call exercise decision for agency, corporate, and municipal bonds. The original definition of efficiency assumes that the refunding bond is optionless. However, in practice, the refunding bond is often callable. We show that the commonly used method of incorporating the value of the refunding bond’s...
متن کاملThe Capitalization of the State Tax Exemption Benefit in Municipal Bond Yields
Thirty-three states treat in-state municipal bond interest income differently from out-of-state municipal bond interest income. While they tax the interest income of out-of-state bonds, they exempt interest income of in-state bonds from state taxes. This differential treatment in taxes creates a demand for in-state bonds and provides a disincentive for holding out-of-state bonds. A priori, this...
متن کاملCredit Risk and Local Government Bonds: A Case from China
Issuing local government bonds will become a main financing manner and channel of municipal infrastructure in China while its major problem is volumes and credit risk control. Based on the KMV model, the credit risk model for municipal bonds is constructed in this paper and further study the patterns its probability distribution to improve prediction accuracy. After determining the forecast sta...
متن کاملDistance Still Matters: Evidence from Municipal Bond Underwriting
We provide evidence of “soft” information production in investment banking. Using 2191 municipal bond offerings from 1997-2001, we find that “local” investment banks have substantial comparative and absolute advantages over non-local counterparts – locals charge lower fees and sell bonds at lower yields. Local investment banks’ strongest comparative advantage is at underwriting bonds with highe...
متن کامل